Legal Opinion

City of Leesburg v. Knight

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 29, 1964No. 4715PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHANNON, Acting Chief Judge.

This suit has been instituted against certain defendants, including Defendant Warren and his wife, and certain of their grantees, because of certain transactions between the appellant municipality and Warren, both prior to and during the period in which he served as appellant’s city attorney. The purpose of the suit is to obtain specific performance of a repurchase option reserved by appellant in a deed to Warren before he became city attorney, to set aside certain transactions between the City and Warren which allegedly took place while he was city attorney, to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Creash v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
  2. Borough of Vineland v. MarettiNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1922
  3. Valdez v. State Ex Rel. FarriorSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
  4. Brooker v. SmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
  5. Losey v. State Ex Rel. GiblinSupreme Court of Florida · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. EvansDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  2. Telophase Soc. of Fla., Inc. v. State Bd. of Fun. D. & E.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  3. Warren v. City of LeesburgDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
  4. Soranaka v. CookDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API