Legal Opinion
Soranaka v. Cook
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 9, 1977No. 76-1212PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
BOARDMAN, Chief Judge.
Appellees/plaintiffs filed suit and prayed for damages and a mandatory injunction to enforce a restrictive covenant on real property in Hillsborough County, Florida. The restrictive covenant provided that:
No chain link fence shall be erected on any lot between the front building line and the street.
Appellants/defendants answered and asserted two affirmative defenses:
1. That said alleged restrictive covenants is an unreasonable, arbitrary, and *52capricious restriction on Defendants’ free and enjoyable use of their real property. 2. That this action is a violation of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hagan v. Sabal Palms, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
- National Life Insurance Company v. HarriottDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
- Brooker v. SmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
- Telophase Soc. of Fla., Inc. v. State Bd. of Fun. D. & E.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
- City of Leesburg v. KnightDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kies v. HollubDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984