Legal Opinion

Cairl v. Boeing Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 15, 1974No. Civ. 42559PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DUNN, J.

Plaintiffs appeal from an order (“judgment,” Code Civ. Proc., § 581d) dismissing their complaint following the sustaining of the demurrer of defendant, The Boeing Company, which asserted the court had no jurisdiction of the subject matter of the action. (Code Civ. Proc., § 430.10, subd. (a).)

Plaintiffs are the minor children of Earl Raymond Cairl, deceased, who sue through a guardian ad litem. Their verified complaint for alleged wrongful death is in five counts, each of which, excepting the fifth count, alleges decedent fell from a B-52 aircraft, negligently, defectively, etc.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Moragne v. States Marine Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Faulkner v. California Toll Bridge AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Wilson v. Transocean AirlinesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1954
  4. Wallace Higa, Administrator of the Estate of Takeichi Higa, Deceased v. Transocean Airlines, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  5. Beatty v. Pacific States Savings and Loan Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chromy v. LawranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  2. Bailey v. Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  3. Touhey v. Carnivale Cruise LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API