Legal Opinion

Robert Earl McCoy v. Judge Marcus D. Gordon

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 22, 1983No. 83-4236PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

Having granted the petitioner the right to appeal in forma pauperis, we have, sua sponte, reviewed the record in this case and concluded that some of the issues sought to be raised on appeal are frivolous. We, therefore, dismiss the appeal as to those defendants against whom the appeal is patently insubstantial and we also dismiss all but the nonfrivolous claims asserted against the remaining defendant.

The petitioner, Robert Earl McCoy, is serving a life sentence for murder. He brought this civil rights suit against a state judge, various county officials, and his own trial lawyers,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Wayne Ernest Barker v. Ben Norman and Jack BallasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Francis Nolan Augustine v. John Doe, Deputy Sheriff, Lafayette ParishCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  2. Mrs. Susie Lite Morrison v. City of Baton RougeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  3. Graves v. HamptonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  4. Geter v. FortenberryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  5. Robert McGruder v. Albert L. Necaise, William Eugene Henry and State of MississippiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API