Commonwealth v. Lent
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.
We consider whether the Commonwealth may properly indict and try the defendant Lent for the 1990 murder of a young boy whom Lent kidnapped in Pittsfield, took *765to western New York State, and then killed. We conclude that the Commonwealth has authority to indict and try Lent for murder, and, therefore, a Superior Court judge properly denied Lent’s motion to dismiss the murder indictment.
Pursuant to Mass. R. Crim. P. 34, 378 Mass. 905 (1979), the Superior Court judge reported the propriety of his order denying the motion to dismiss the indictment for murder.1 We allowed Lent’s application for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. McCarthyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- State v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Commonwealth v. PierceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
- State v. GrissomSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
- Lane v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ManningMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
- Commonwealth v. BoydMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2008
- Commonwealth v. JaynesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
- Commonwealth v. CombsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
- Commonwealth v. MurphyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.