Legal Opinion

R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company v. Phil J. Marotta, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Phil Felice Marotta

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 6, 2016No. 4D13-1703PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CIKLIN, C.Jv

In this Engle progeny case, 1 R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company (“the defendant”) appeals a final judgment entered in favor of Phil J. Marotta, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Phil Felice Marotta (“the plaintiff’); arguing that federal law implicitly preempts state law tort claims of strict liability and negligence based on the sale of cigarettes and that the use of the Engle defect finding resulted in a violation of due process. The plaintiff cross-appeals, contending that the trial court erred in precluding the jury from considering punitive damages on the products…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Bates v. Dow Agrosciences LLCSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Engle v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2006
  4. Mut. Pharm. Co. v. BartlettSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. DouglasSupreme Court of Florida · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company v. Phil J. Marotta, etc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2017
  2. Berger v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2016
  3. Philip Morris USA Inc. v. McKeeverDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  4. Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. LourieDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  5. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. MonroeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API