Legal Opinion

Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. Lourie

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 10, 2016No. 2D14-5403PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KHOUZAM, Judge.

In this Engle-progeny case, 1 Philip Morris USA, Inc., and R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. timely appeal the final judgment entered in favor of James Lourie, as personal representative of the Estate of Barbara Ruth Lourie. The tobacco company defendants argue that federal law implicitly preempts state law tort claims of strict liability and negligence for the sale of cigarettes because federal law effectively prohibits states 'from banning cigarette sales and the Engle Phase I findings amount to a ban on selling cigarettes. We affirm because the implied preemption argument is not…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Gade v. National Solid Wastes Management Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Retail Clerks International Ass'n, Local 1625 v. SchermerhornSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Chamber of Commerce of United States of America v. WhitingSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company v. Phil J. Marotta, etc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2017
  2. R.J. Reynolds Company v. DionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  3. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. DionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API