Legal Opinion
Stephen Ward v. Harold Copenhaver, et al.
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Decided September 25, 2026No. 3:22-cv-00250Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION STEPHEN WARD PLAINTIFF v. Case No. 3:22-cv-00250-LPR-BBM HAROLD COPENHAVER, et al., DEFENDANTS ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Stephen Ward’s Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint, (Doc. 208), which Defendants Harold Copenhaver, Carol Duncan, Jeffrey Moore, and Larry Rogers oppose. (Doc. 215). For the following reasons, Ward’s Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. I. BACKGROUND Ward is proceeding pro se. On…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.