Legal Opinion

State v. Steinolfson

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1992No. Crim. 910319PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Justice.

Arlan Steinolfson appealed from an order denying his motion for correction of an illegal sentence and for correction of a sentence imposed in an illegal manner pursuant to Rule 35, NDRCrimP. We conclude Steinolfson agreed to pay restitution as part of his plea agreement and we affirm.

Steinolfson was involved in an automobile accident but did not stop at the scene. He was subsequently charged with leaving the scene of an accident involving personal injury. See NDCC § 39-08-04. Steinolf-son signed a written plea agreement; the county court entered a judgment of conviction…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  2. People v. QuinonezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  3. State v. WoodworthNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  4. State v. PhillipsArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. ThorstadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. MartinezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Commonwealth v. MorsemanKentucky Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State of New Hampshire v. Louise E. PinaultSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015
  4. State v. RogersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  5. State v. PippinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API