Legal Opinion

Dyson v. Bux

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 8, 1911No. 17,008PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Shawnee district court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

West, J.:

Dyson sued Bux, Stadel and Bauerlein, and alleged that he contracted orally with Bauerlein to sell him one-half of the north wall on lot 61, which wall was upon and up to the north line of the lot; that Bauerlein desired to purchase the one-half in order to make the wall a party wall, he owning the lot adjoining on the north; that before the oral contract was carried out the plaintiff started negotiations with Bux and Stadel for the exchange of lot 61 for certain mill property, and that during such negotiations he informed them that if the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Triplett v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  2. Nolan v. OtneySupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  3. Read v. LoftusSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  4. Palmer Oil & Gas Co. v. BlodgettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899
  5. Hampe v. HigginsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Shepard v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962
  2. Sailer v. FurcheTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
  3. Brungardt v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1955
  4. Bennett v. HumphreysSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
  5. Farmers & Drovers National Bank v. HannamanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API