Legal Opinion

Nordale v. Fisher

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1963No. 6889PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAUL H. CASTRO, Superior Court Judge.

This is an action by plaintiffs-appellants against defendant-appellee for the recovery of a real estate commission based on a claim that defendant as owner gave plaintiff broker a seventy-five day exclusive listing and then sold the property to a buyer within a seventy-three day period. Plaintiffs filed a complaint alleging two causes of action. Joseph Nordale filed in his individual capacity as a licensed real estate broker and as a broker for Joseph Nordale Realty and Insurance Company, an Arizona corporation.

It is undisputed that on December 9, 1957…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. SiefkeNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. First National Bank v. FordWyoming Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Eldridge v. JaggerArizona Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Daru v. MartinArizona Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Simpson v. DavisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ulan v. RichtarsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  2. Carver v. Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'nArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Graham v. Vegetable Oil Products CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  4. East Camelback Homeowners Ass'n v. Arizona Foundation for Neurology & PsychiatryCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  5. Hackin v. First National Bank of Arizona, PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API