Legal Opinion

Unrine v. Salina Northern Railroad

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 8, 1919No. 21,915PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Saline district court; Dallas Grover, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The action was one to recover compensation for personal injuries. A demurrer was sustained to, one defense of the answer of the receivers, and they appeal.

In July, 1917, the defendants Brent and Goebel were appointed receivers for the Salina Northern Railroad Company. The injury complained of occurred on September 25, 1917. The answer of the receivers was that in January,. 1916, the railroad company had elected not to accept the provisions of the workmen’s compensation act. '

*237The demurrer wás properly sustained. • When the receivers took"…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Chilletti ex rel. Chilletti v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1918

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lively v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  2. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. FullerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  3. Cox v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  4. Gimple v. HinesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  5. Bredeweg v. First State BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API