Legal Opinion
Sehgal v. Sehgal
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 3, 1995PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Lewis Friedman, J.), entered on or about December 21, 1994, which granted the motion by intervenor-respondent Merrill Lynch Credit Corporation ("Merrill Lynch”) to cancel the notice of pendency filed by plaintiff on December 23,1991 with the County Clerk of Nassau County with respect to real property located at 351 Lido Boulevard, Lido Beach, New York, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The IAS Court, in granting the motion by Merrill Lynch seeking to vacate the notice of pendency on the subject property, properly determined that the complaint filed…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ball v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- 5303 Realty Corp. v. O & Y Equity Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Borrero v. East Harlem Council for Human Services, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Gross v. GrossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
3Cited by3 opinions
- Diaz v. PatersonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Caruso, Caruso & Branda, P.C. v. HirschAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Arteaga v. MartinezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010