Legal Opinion

Borrero v. East Harlem Council for Human Services, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 27, 1990PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (David Edwards, Jr., J.), which canceled plaintiff’s notice of pendency, is unanimously affirmed, without costs.

*808In May 1985, plaintiff provided architectural goods and services to the defendants in the amount of $43,079. In October of 1987, he commenced an action for payment. The complaint requested only money damages. In November 1987, he filed a notice of pendency.

On February 27, 1990, the defendant filed an order to show cause requesting that the notice of pendency be canceled so it could convey the property to the IRS. There was no mechanic’s lien nor…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gokey v. MasseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
  2. Rosenberg v. RitterNew York Supreme Court · 1962

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Liselli v. LiselliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. Distinctive Custom Homes Building Corp. v. EstevesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. Roberts v. KarimiDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1999
  4. Sehgal v. SehgalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. M & B Joint Venture, Inc. v. Laurus Master Fund, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API