Legal Opinion
BRYANT v. CITY OF NEWARK
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided December 22, 2021No. 2:19-cv-17592Unknown
1Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY RAHEEM BRYANT, Civil Action No.: 2:19-cv-17592 Plaintiff, v. Opinion & Order CITY OF NEWARK, ET AL., Defendants. CECCHI, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on defendant the City of Newark (“Defendant” or “Newark”) and defendant Officer Xavier O. Pimentel’s (“Defendant” or “Officer Pimentel”) motion for summary judgment in part and motion to dismiss in part as against Plaintiff Raheem Bryant’s (“Plaintiff”) First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 58), pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 56 and 12(b)(6).…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Randy Mulholland v. Government County of BerksCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- Norman Shelton v. Bryan BledsoeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- Dowling v. City of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.