(PS) Roberts v. Sacramento Housing & Redevelopment Agency

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 SYDNEY BROOKE ROBERTS and No. 2:22-cv-01699 DJC AC PS DAVID TYRONE SAMUEL, et al., 11 Plaintiffs, 12 ORDER and v. 13 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SACRAMENTO HOUSING AND 14 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiffs are proceeding in this matter pro se, and pre-trial proceedings are accordingly 18 referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). The case proceeds on the basis of 19 the Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”). ECF No. 11. Defendants have moved to dismiss, ECF 20 No.…