Miller v. Grier S. Johnson, Inc.
Supreme Court of Virginia
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the CourtHudgins, C. J.
The dominant question in this case is, whether the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to continue the case on motion of defendant.
The pertinent facts are that Grier S. Johnson, Incorporated, instituted an action by notice of motion against Louise H. Miller, to recover $3,100 alleged to be due by her for work done and material furnished. On November 21, 1949, the return day of the process, L. S. Parsons appeared as counsel for defendant, pleaded the general issue, and filed a special plea, in which defendant admitted employing plaintiff to do the work and furnish the material, but…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Norfolk & Western Railroad v. H. I. ShottSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
- City of Norfolk v. Norfolk CountySupreme Court of Virginia · 1917
- Matthews v. LaPradeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1921
- Bardach Iron & Steel Co. v. TenenbaumSupreme Court of Virginia · 1923
- Mankin v. AldridgeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Allen v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1981
- Nannie v. Compton v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
- Alexander v. KuykendallSupreme Court of Virginia · 1951
- Haugen v. SHENANDOAH VALLEY SOCIAL SERVICESSupreme Court of Virginia · 2007
- Dickson v. BoberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.