Legal Opinion

State v. Teal

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 21, 1918No. 9859PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Before Smith, J., Greenville, Spring term, 1917. W. A. Teal was convicted of seduction, and he appeals. The following is the Judge’s charge: Mr. Foreman and gentlemen of the jury, at the time and place and in the manner therein described the defendant at the bar is charged in this bill of indictment with the statutory crime of seduction.

Read the full summary

Before Smith, J., Greenville, Spring term, 1917. W. A. Teal was convicted of seduction, and he appeals. The following is the Judge’s charge: Mr. Foreman and gentlemen of the jury, at the time and place and in the manner therein described the defendant at the bar is charged in this bill of indictment with the statutory crime of seduction. This crime did not exist under the English common law, which was made the basis of our system of jurisprudence in every State of the Union except the State of Louisiana, but it was made a crime under an early English' statute and it has been generally made a…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Gage.

The defendant was found guilty of seduction by means of deception and promise of marriage. The judgment was 3 years imprisonment. The defendant has appealed.

There are 18 exceptions, but the argument expressly makes the following issues, stated in dependent order, to wit: (1) The question of corroborating testimony was wrongfully left in the first instance to the jury, when it ought to have been decided by the Court. (2) The Court admitted incompetent testimony for corroboration, to wit, the testimony of the woman’s father as to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. AbbottSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
  2. State v. WhitakerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1916
  3. State v. TurnerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1909
  4. State v. LivingstonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1916

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Franklin v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Basile v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1944
  3. State v. PettisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Ex Parte: Moore v. PattersonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
  5. Duggins v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API