Legal Opinion · Dissent

Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 7, 1983No. 82-1622Published

1DissentLocher, J.

Once again a majority of this court confirms a company-oriented assault on the test-year concept. See, e.g., Consumers’ Counsel v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1983), 6 Ohio St. 3d 405, 410 (No. 83-1428) (Locher, J., dissenting); Consumers’ Counsel v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1983), 6 Ohio St. 3d 412, 415 (No. 82-1461) (Locher, J., dissenting). Therefore, I must dissent.

In Consumers’ Counsel v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1981), 67 Ohio St. 2d 153, we refused to allow the utility to pass on the cost of cancelled nuclear plants to consumers. “It is our opinion that R.C. 4909.15 (A)(4) is designed to take into account the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API