Legal Opinion

Morgan v. Morgan

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 30, 1921No. 10642PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Before MclvER, J., Lancaster, October, 1920. Action by Adam, Morgan against W. L. Morgan, Edna Morgan Mungo, Bessie Morgan Fade and Ora Morgan, From judgment for plaintiff the three first named defendants appeal. The following is the decree referred to in opinion: The plaintiff sues to set aside four deeds, one to each of the defendants, his children.

Read the full summary

Before MclvER, J., Lancaster, October, 1920. Action by Adam, Morgan against W. L. Morgan, Edna Morgan Mungo, Bessie Morgan Fade and Ora Morgan, From judgment for plaintiff the three first named defendants appeal. The following is the decree referred to in opinion: The plaintiff sues to set aside four deeds, one to each of the defendants, his children. His cause of action is that they are clouds on his title to land described therein; that the record interferes with his management of his financial affairs; that they discriminate against other children of his by his present wife, and against…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Watts.

For the reasons assigned by his Honor, Judge McIver, it is the judgment of this Court that the judgment of the Circuit Court be affirmed.

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Alexander v. KerhulasSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
  2. Durham v. BlackardCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993
  3. Burke v. BurkeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
  4. First Union National Bank v. ShealyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API