Legal Opinion

State v. Jones

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 1, 1973No. 385, September Term, 1972PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoylan, J.

To dismiss, with prejudice, an indictment for armed robbery, because a defendant claims he was denied a speedy trial, is a severe sanction. It is the final denial of organized society’s right to bring an accused transgressor before the bar of justice. In the face of vexing delays, lesser remedies may well commend themselves: the State may be put to the extraordinary burden of proceeding to trial on short or well-nigh immediate notice; a defendant’s request for pretrial release, on bail or recognizance, may take on additional merit. 1 To say, however, that the people, because they have not yet…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Kardy v. SHOOK, J.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1965

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Epps v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  2. State v. GeeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  3. Erbe v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  4. State v. MouldenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  5. Guarnera v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API