Legal Opinion

The Florida Bar v. Hayden

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 27, 1991No. 75351PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

583 So.2d 1016 (1991)

THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant,

v.

Robert K. HAYDEN, Respondent.

No. 75351.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 27, 1991.

Rehearing Denied September 3, 1991.

John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director and John T. Berry, Staff Counsel, Tallahassee, and Susan V. Bloemendaal, Asst. Staff Counsel, Tampa, for complainant.

Richard A. Greenberg, Tallahassee, and Denis M. de Vlaming, Clearwater, for respondent.

2Per curiam

This matter is before us upon the referee's report recommending respondent Robert K. Hayden be suspended from the practice of law for six months for violating rules 4-1.2(a) and 4-3.1 of…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Grimes; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Grimes.

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. ColcloughSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
  2. The Florida Bar v. BajoczkySupreme Court of Florida · 1990
  3. Florida Bar v. HaydenSupreme Court of Florida · 1986

4Cited by12 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. FredericksSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  2. The Florida Bar v. MieleSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  3. In Re HensonSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  4. The Florida Bar v. RoodSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  5. The Florida Bar v. BatistaSupreme Court of Florida · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API