Legal Opinion

Pruitt v. Cargill, Inc.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 4, 1985No. 84-197PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jack Holt, Jr., Chief Justice.

The question before the court concerns the granting of a motion for summary judgment. We affirm the trial court.

The appellant, Coy W. Pruitt, and the appellee, Cargill, Inc., entered into a Feeder Pig Production and Hog Feeding Agreement. During the course of the agreement, Pruitt purchased a used water tank. The tank was delivered to the appellant by an employee of Cargill. Subsequently, Cargill filed suit against Pruitt seeking the balance due on a loan. Pruitt filed a counterclaim in which he alleged that Cargill had supplied him with the water tank and that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tauber-Arons Auctioneers Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  2. Hughes Western World, Inc. v. Westmoor Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  3. McKENNA v. Art Pearl Works, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Lancaster v. W.A. Hartzell & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Cash v. CarterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  2. Wolner v. BogaevSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  3. Howard v. Northwest Arkansas Surgical Clinic, P.A.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  4. Headrick v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  5. Daniels v. Colonial InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API