Pruitt v. Cargill, Inc.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Jack Holt, Jr., Chief Justice.
The question before the court concerns the granting of a motion for summary judgment. We affirm the trial court.
The appellant, Coy W. Pruitt, and the appellee, Cargill, Inc., entered into a Feeder Pig Production and Hog Feeding Agreement. During the course of the agreement, Pruitt purchased a used water tank. The tank was delivered to the appellant by an employee of Cargill. Subsequently, Cargill filed suit against Pruitt seeking the balance due on a loan. Pruitt filed a counterclaim in which he alleged that Cargill had supplied him with the water tank and that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Tauber-Arons Auctioneers Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Hughes Western World, Inc. v. Westmoor Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- McKENNA v. Art Pearl Works, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Lancaster v. W.A. Hartzell & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
3Cited by14 opinions
- Cash v. CarterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Wolner v. BogaevSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
- Howard v. Northwest Arkansas Surgical Clinic, P.A.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Headrick v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
- Daniels v. Colonial InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.