Legal Opinion

People v. Hampton

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 9, 1974No. 26026, 26027PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erickson

In two separate cases, the defendant Hampton filed Crim. P. 35(b) motions which were denied without a hearing. The denial of post-conviction relief and of an evidentiary hearing precipitated an appeal in both cases. We reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing in accordance with the standards which are enunciated in this opinion.

The validity of a guilty plea is again the issue on appeal. We are faced with the perennial problem of searching a stale record to review a providency hearing which occurred long ago to determine whether an accused was afforded every right guaranteed by the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Norvell v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. People v. HubbardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
  3. People v. ShearerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
  4. People v. BucciSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  2. People v. WiedemerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  3. People v. TurmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  4. Edwards v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
  5. People v. MunizSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API