Legal Opinion

Stooksberry v. Pigg

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 31, 1927PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, J.,

(after stating the facts). Under the instructions of the court, to the effect that, if the jury should find that the plaintiff and the defendant entered into an oral agreement for the sale of the land described in the complaint, and the defendant took possession of the land under said oral agreement, the agreement became binding upon the defendant; and, if he failed to comply with the terms of the oral agreement, he was liable to plaintiff for damages for breach' of the contract. This instruction was erroneous.

This was an action to recover damages for the breach of an oral contract…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cook v. CaveSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
  2. Phillips v. GrubbsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
  3. Henry & Bro. v. WellsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1886
  4. O'Bryan v. ZuberSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  5. Storthz v. WattsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hanna v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
  2. Elm Springs State Bank v. BradleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  3. Smith v. MaloneCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003
  4. Norton v. HindsleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
  5. Smith v. MaloneCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API