Legal Opinion

Elm Springs State Bank v. Bradley

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 29, 1929PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

The appellant hank sued the appellee Bradley upon a note executed to its order by Nannie and Claude Cowan, and in its amended complaint alleged the following facts as constituting its cause of action: The note sued on was a renewal note, and in making the original loan appellee “verbally stated that ‘Nannie Cowan is my sister-in-law, and if the bank will make this loan I will personally guarantee the repayment of same. ’ ” It was further alleged: ‘ ‘ That said hank, relying upon said statement of personal guaranty so made by the said W. J. Bradley, did make said loan to the said Nannie Cowan…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Fulbright v. PhippsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  2. Ackley v. . ParmenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  3. Brown v. Arkansas Central Power Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  4. Millsaps v. NixonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  5. Cook v. CaveSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Trammell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
  2. Norton v. HindsleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
  3. Foster-Grayson Lumber Co. v. TalleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
  4. Missouri Pacific Railroad Co. v. ForeseeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  5. Moore v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API