Burns v. Simmons
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Shelby Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
The circuit court permitted the appellees to amend the petition, which they had filed before the commissioners, praying for the establishment of a highway, and the principal question in the case arises upon that ruling.
It is settled by our decisions that the circuit court may permit amendments to be made to petitions in highway cases. Hedrick v. Hedrick, 55 Ind. 78; Goodwin v. Smith, 72 Ind. 113 (37 Am. R. 144); Porter v. Stout, 73 Ind. 3; Green v. Elliott, 86 Ind. 53, see opinion 63. In Coalman v. Fleming, 82 Ind. 117, it was held that a petition in a drainage case *558might be amended on appeal…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Green v. ElliottIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Goodwin v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Doctor v. HartmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Porter v. StoutIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Turley v. OldhamIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Metty v. MarshIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- McKeen v. PorterIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Head v. DoehlemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
- Trittipo v. BeaverIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
- Aetna Life Insurance v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.