Legal Opinion · Concurring in the judgment

Dunn v. Bruzzese

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 29, 2007No. 06 JE 2Published

1Concurring in the judgmentWaite, J.

{¶ 70} Although I agree with the majority that the trial court’s judgment should be affirmed, I disagree with the manner in which the age-discrimination portion of the appeal was resolved. Thus, I concur in judgment only. Unlike the majority, I believe that the trial court was correct when it concluded that the statutorily prescribed election of remedies barred appellant from seeking any further relief in a civil action in state court because she had already filed an administrative action with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”). It is apparent, though, that even if the trial…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Mauzy v. Kelly Services, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Coryell v. Bank One Trust Co. N.A.Ohio Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Reese v. Ohio State University HospitalsOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Morris v. Kaiser Engineers, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API