Legal Opinion
Miley v. Nash
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided July 10, 2015No. 2D14-930PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CRENSHAW, Judge.
Appellant’s motion for rehearing is granted in part. The prior opinion dated April 29, 2015, is withdrawn, and the attached opinion is issued in its place. No further motions for rehearing will be entertained.
In this appeal we review an order denying a motion for entitlement to attorney’s fees and costs pursuant to a proposal for settlement, which the trial court found failed to strictly comply with section 768.79, Florida Statutes (2018), and Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.442. Because the trial court erred in finding the proposal for settlement legally insufficient, we…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. NicholsSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
- Lucas v. CalhounDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- United Services Auto. Ass'n v. BeharDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- CAREY-ALL TRANSPORT, INC. v. NewbyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- BD. OF TRUSTEES OF FL. ATL. UNIV. v. BowmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Troy Anderson v. Hilton Hotels Corporation, etc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2016
- W. Riley Allen v. Jairo Rafael NunezSupreme Court of Florida · 2018
- Saterbo v. MarkusonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Pacheco v. GonzalezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- NEIL J. WEINER v. JENNIFER MAULDENDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.