Legal Opinion
Saterbo v. Markuson
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided September 21, 2016No. 2D14-2737PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTION FOR REVIEW OF TRIAL COURT’S ORDER DENYING APPELLATE ATTORNEYS’ FEES
MORRIS, Judge.
Benjamin Markuson seeks review of the trial court’s order denying his motion for appellate attorneys’ fees. Because we conclude that the trial court erred by finding that Markuson’s proposal for settlement was unenforceable, we disapprove that portion of the trial court’s order and remand for entry of an order granting appellate attorneys’ fees as against Erik Sater-bo and his insurer.
I. Background of the Case
Following an automobile accident between Markuson and Erik, Markuson filed a personal…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. NicholsSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
- Ancel Pratt, Jr. v. Michael C. Weiss, D.O.Supreme Court of Florida · 2015
- Attorneys' Title Insurance Fund, Inc. v. GorkaSupreme Court of Florida · 2010
- CAREY-ALL TRANSPORT, INC. v. NewbyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- In Re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Civil ProcedureSupreme Court of Florida · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Pacheco v. GonzalezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Peltz v. Trust Hospitality International, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- BRIGHT HOUSE NETWORKS, L L C v. ALBERT B. CASSIDYDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Diecidue v. LewisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO. v. GLORIA R. WASHINGTONDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.