Legal Opinion
Stephanie Miller v. City of Monona
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided May 1, 2015No. 13-2575PublishedCited by 99 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TINDER, Circuit Judge.
This appeal requires us to again address the boundaries of the class-of-one doctrine under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Stephanie Miller and her husband James Stellhorn, along with their co-owned company, Harlan LLC, brought suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the City of Monona, Wisconsin, and various public officials involved in their protracted effort to gain approval to build a condominium project. Miller spearheaded this effort, so for the sake of simplicity, we will use her name as shorthand for the other appellants unless necessary to…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Engquist v. Oregon Department of AgricultureSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Geinosky v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Staub v. Proctor HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by99 opinions
- James Brunson v. Scott MurrayCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- 145 Fisk, LLC v. F. William NicklasCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
- XP Vehicles, Inc. v. Department of EnergyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Tony Love v. Frank VanihelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2023
- Chicago Studio Rental, Incorpo v. Illinois Department of CommercCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.