Legal Opinion

Oliver v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided June 13, 1990No. 09-89-002 CR, 09-89-003 CRPublished

1Opinion of the Court

787 S.W.2d 170 (1990)

William Robert OLIVER, Appellant,

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

Nos. 09-89-002 CR, 09-89-003 CR.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Beaumont.

March 21, 1990.

Discretionary Review Granted June 13, 1990.

Kenneth W. Smith, Houston, for appellant.

Patrick O. Hardy, Dist. Atty., Woodville, for the State.

OPINION

BURGESS, Justice.

Appellant was convicted, in a consolidated trial, of the offenses of possession of the controlled substances phenylacetone in an amount in excess of 400 grams and methamphetamine in an amount less than 28 grams. The jury assessed punishment at ninety-nine years'…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  3. Strauder v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. Arline v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  5. Butler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API