Legal Opinion

Beaver v. Cecil D. Andrus

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 5, 1980No. 79-2267Published

1Opinion of the Court

637 F.2d 749

15 ERC 1361, 11 Envtl. L. Rep. 20,208

BEAVER, BOUNTIFUL, ENTERPRISE, Ephraim, Fairview, Fillmore,

Heber, Holden, Hurricane, Hyrum, Kanosh, Kaysville, Lehi,

Logan, Meadow, Monroe, Morgan, Mt. Pleasant, Murray, Oak

City, Parowan, Spring City and St. George, Municipal

Corporations and Bodies Politic of the State of Utah, and

Anaheim, Burbank, Glendale, Pasadena, Riverside and Los

Angeles, Municipal Corporations and Bodies Politic of the

State of California, and Intermountain Power Project, a

Nonprofit Corporation of the State of Utah, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

Cecil D. ANDRUS, Secretary, United…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Public Serv. Co. of Colorado v. AndrusDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1977
  2. Alumet v. Cecil D. AndrusCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
  3. Beaver, Bountiful, Enterprise v. AndrusCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API