State v. J.Y.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
HUBBART, Judge.
This is an appeal by the state from a trial court order in a juvenile delinquency proceeding suppressing certain incriminating statements made by the respondent J.Y. to the police. The trial court suppressed the statements because admittedly no Miranda warnings were given to the respondent prior to the police interrogation which produced the statements. The state contended in the trial court that no Miranda warnings were required because the statements were obtained during a consensual encounter between the police and the respondent. The trial court disagreed and concluded…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- California v. BehelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Orozco v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. PettisSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In re L.M.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Michael Alvarado v. R.Q. Hickman, Warden, Acting Warden of Mule Creek State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Timmons v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- State v. C.F.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- Goss v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.