Legal Opinion

Hillman v. Hillman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1906No. 5984PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Griffin, J., entered June 26, 1905, upon findings in favor of interveners, upon the. voluntary dismissal of an action for divorce.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

— The appellants Bessie Olive Hillman and Clarence D. Hillman are husband and wife, and the appellant Homer L. Hillman is the brother and business partner of Clarence D. Hillman. The respondents Steele & Brown are attorneys at law. On March 21, 1904, the appellant Bessie Olive Hillman began an action for divorce', and for "a partition of the community property, against her husband, joining her husband’s brother as a party defendant because of the business relations existing between'him and her husband. The respondents Steele and Brown appeared as attorneys for Mrs. Hillman. A preliminary…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  2. McCulloch v. MurphyIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Stover v. StoverIdaho Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Sims v. DavisNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Miller v. JonesTennessee Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re the Proceedings for the Discipline of SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Yoder v. YoderWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Keefer v. KeeferSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  4. Delbridge v. BeachWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Humphries v. CooperWashington Supreme Court · 1909

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API