Neblett v. Armstrong
Texas Commission of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtLeddy, J.
A promissory note executed by defendant in error was discharged by bankruptcy proceedings unless the same was revived by a new promise made by him subsequent to his discharge. The promise relied upon to revive the debt was made in a letter written by defendant in error to the payee of the note, reading as follows: “You can count on getting a part of the money I owe you this fall. I can’t yet say how much, but you are on the list to be paid first.”
A debt discharged by bankruptcy proceedings is not a debt paid, as the moral obligation remains, and, under all the authorities, such obligation is…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Allen & Co. v. FergusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Shockey v. MillsIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Moore v. TrounstineSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Riggs v. . RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
- Coe v. RoseneWashington Supreme Court · 1911
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Lone Star Gas Co. v. X-Ray Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
- Henshaw v. Texas Natural Resources FoundationTexas Supreme Court · 1949
- Superior Oil Co. v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1951
- Warren v. SchaweCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
- Slay v. Mary Couts Burnett TrustCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.