Legal Opinion

Neblett v. Armstrong

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided April 9, 1930No. 1191 — 5532PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeddy, J.

A promissory note executed by defendant in error was discharged by bankruptcy proceedings unless the same was revived by a new promise made by him subsequent to his discharge. The promise relied upon to revive the debt was made in a letter written by defendant in error to the payee of the note, reading as follows: “You can count on getting a part of the money I owe you this fall. I can’t yet say how much, but you are on the list to be paid first.”

A debt discharged by bankruptcy proceedings is not a debt paid, as the moral obligation remains, and, under all the authorities, such obligation is…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Allen & Co. v. FergusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Shockey v. MillsIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Moore v. TrounstineSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  4. Riggs v. . RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  5. Coe v. RoseneWashington Supreme Court · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lone Star Gas Co. v. X-Ray Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Henshaw v. Texas Natural Resources FoundationTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Superior Oil Co. v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Warren v. SchaweCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  5. Slay v. Mary Couts Burnett TrustCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API