Legal Opinion

Brady v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1954PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeown, J.

In their first cause of action plaintiffs allege that the deaths were due to the negligence of the railroad company in failing to fence its right of way at the place where the boys entered upon railroad property and proceeded to the bridge. The trial court found as a matter of law that this spot was within the depot grounds and, therefore, the railroad had no duty to fence it, as declared by sec. 192.33 (1), Stats. Incidentally, the jury reached the same conclusion in its special verdict as a matter of fact. There can be no quarrel with this determination.

Appellants present the case of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Klix v. NiemanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Hasbrouck v. Armour & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Brinilson v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Angelier v. Red Star Yeast & Products Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Sage's Admr. v. Creech Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Cords v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Terpstra v. Soiltest, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Montega Corp. v. GroomsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  4. Christians Ex Rel. Davis v. Homestake Enterprises, Ltd.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Cheryl D. Bonney, as Personal Representative and Administratrix of the Estate of Rodney Bonney v. Canadian National Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API