Legal Opinion

Soliz v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided February 28, 1990No. 13-88-540-CRPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SEERDEN, Justice.

A jury found appellant guilty of the felony offense of burglary of a habitation. The trial court found the enhancement paragraph true and assessed punishment at 30 years’ confinement. Appellant claims that the evidence is insufficient to support the judgment in that the State failed to prove that the burgled structure was a habitation under Tex.Penal Code Ann. § 30.01(1) (Vernon 1989). We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

In reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence, an appellate court views the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution and determines…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Butler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  2. Blankenship v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  3. Chandler v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1987

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. David Howard RooneySupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
  2. People v. RodriguezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  3. Wedlow v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1991
  4. Alfredo Bermudes Jr. A/K/A Alfredo Bermudes v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2025
  5. Amended June 26, 2015 State of Iowa v. David Howard RooneySupreme Court of Iowa · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API