Legal Opinion

Victor Alvarez Teal v. Kings Farms Company

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided December 28, 1960No. 13245PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KALODNER, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff, Victor Alvarez Teal, appeals from an Order denying his motion for a new trial and judgment on a directed verdict for the defendant, Kings Farms Company, in his action to recover damages for severe injuries suffered in an assault on him by a fellow employee on defendant’s farm in Bucks County, Pennsylvania.

Jurisdiction is based on diversity. 1 Pennsylvania law controls.

Plaintiff’s theory, below and here, is that defendant breached its duty to adequately police his property so as to prevent injuries to persons thereon by any of its employees, and that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dolan v. Linton's LunchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Dincher v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  3. Frazier v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1861
  4. Rosenstiel v. Pittsburg Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  5. Teal v. King Farms Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1960

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dempsey v. Walso Bureau, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Gajkowski v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API