Legal Opinion

Ramirez v. Rackley

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided December 1, 1949No. 70PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Layton, Judge.

Rule 55 (c) provides that “The court may set aside a judgment by default in accordance with Rule 60(b).” Rule 60 (b) states:

"On motion and upon such terms as are just, the court may relieve a party or his legal representative from a final judgment, order,, or proceeding for the following reasons: (1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect; (2) newly discovered-evidence which by due" diligence could not have been discovered, in time to move for a new trial under rule 59 (b) ; (3) fraud (whether heretofore denominated intrinsic or extrinsic), misrepresentation or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hess v. PawloskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Webb Packing Co. v. HarmonSuperior Court of Delaware · 1937
  3. Miles v. LaytonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1937

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Schremp v. MarvelSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979
  2. Shipley v. New Castle CountySupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
  3. Finkbiner v. MullinsSuperior Court of Delaware · 1987
  4. Snyder v. BeamSuperior Court of Delaware · 1977
  5. E. J. Hollingsworth Co. v. CesariniSuperior Court of Delaware · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API