Legal Opinion
Ramirez v. Rackley
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided December 1, 1949No. 70PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Layton, Judge.
Rule 55 (c) provides that “The court may set aside a judgment by default in accordance with Rule 60(b).” Rule 60 (b) states:
"On motion and upon such terms as are just, the court may relieve a party or his legal representative from a final judgment, order,, or proceeding for the following reasons: (1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect; (2) newly discovered-evidence which by due" diligence could not have been discovered, in time to move for a new trial under rule 59 (b) ; (3) fraud (whether heretofore denominated intrinsic or extrinsic), misrepresentation or…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hess v. PawloskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Webb Packing Co. v. HarmonSuperior Court of Delaware · 1937
- Miles v. LaytonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1937
3Cited by7 opinions
- Schremp v. MarvelSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979
- Shipley v. New Castle CountySupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
- Finkbiner v. MullinsSuperior Court of Delaware · 1987
- Snyder v. BeamSuperior Court of Delaware · 1977
- E. J. Hollingsworth Co. v. CesariniSuperior Court of Delaware · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.