Legal Opinion
Aikens v. City of Chicago
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided September 14, 2001No. 93 C 5233Published
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ROSEMOND, United States Magistrate Judge.
Before the Court is the “City of Chicago’s Renewed Motion To Vacate The September SO, 1997, Order Granting Intervention”. The motion is granted.
To better understand the genesis of the motion, some background facts are necessary. On or around January 27, 1992, in-tervenor — plaintiffs Eugene Dickerson, Matthew Kleber, and The Bradley Adam Corporation filed a “Verified Complaint” against defendant City of Chicago seeking injunctive and declaratory relief pursuant to the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, and § 1983 of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ashafa v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Seven Words Llc, a California Limited Liability Company v. Network Solutions, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Thomas R.W., by and Through His Next Friends Pamela R. And Edward W. v. Massachusetts Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- City Of Chicago v. Retired Chicago Police AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Hills of Palos Condominium Ass'n v. I-Del, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.