Legal Opinion
Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. a TO Z EQUIPMENT CORP.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided June 20, 1966No. 64 C 854PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
BRUCHHAUSEN, District Judge.
The plaintiff instituted this action for interpleader. The plaintiff now moves for confirmation of the report of Theodore D. Ostrow, Esq., Special Master appointed by the Court. As additional relief, the plaintiff seeks an award of $12,500 counsel fees, also costs and disbursements, payable out of the fund.
The plaintiff, as surety, issued a bond, pursuant to 40 U.S.C. § 270a in the penal sum of $122,479.50 in behalf of Main Ship Repair Corp., as principal, in favor of the United States of America, as obligee. It accompanied a contract for the repair of a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Continental Casualty Company, a Corporation v. The United States of America for the Use and Benefit of the Robertson Lumbercompany, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
- Lee v. MackNew York Supreme Court · 1959
3Cited by5 opinions
- Companion Life Insurance v. SchafferDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- Midland Insurance Co. v. FriedgoodDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Control Systems, Inc. v. Arundel Corporation, Defendants-Cross Cross-Appellees v. Lar Electric, Inc., Defendant-Cross Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Arundel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- In re Watson Seafood & Poultry Co.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1986