Legal Opinion

United States v. Arundel Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 10, 1987No. 85-4948PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge:

In this action under the Miller Act, 40 U.S.C. § 270a et seq., a general contractor, the electrical subcontractor, and their sureties appeal the district court’s findings of liability and dismissal of their cross-actions and counterclaims. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and reverse and remand in part.

I. BACKGROUND

Defendants The Arundel Corporation, Guy F. Atkinson Company, and Gordon H. Bell, Inc., d/b/a Dillingham Heavy Construction, Inc., joint venturers (hereinafter referred to as Arundel), contracted with the Army Corps of Engineers in 1978 for the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Tideway Oil Programs, Inc. v. SerioMississippi Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Mary GLASS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PETRO-TEX CHEMICAL CORP., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  3. Gardner v. JonesMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Sime Construction Co. v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  5. United States Ex Rel. I. Burack, Inc. v. Sovereign Construction Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Control Systems, Inc. v. Arundel Corporation, Defendants-Cross Cross-Appellees v. Lar Electric, Inc., Defendant-Cross Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API