Legal Opinion

State ex rel. O'Connell v. Nelson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1893No. 967PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Scott, J.

O’Connell, the relator, was in December, 1892, elected road overseer of a district designated as 18, in King county, and qualified and entered upon his duties. On the 7th day of January following, the county commissioners made some change in certain of the road districts, by virtue of which that part of district 18 in which O’Connell resided was cut off therefrom, and was included in an adjoining district numbered 19, whereupon said commissioners appointed the respondent road overseer of said district 18, as changed. Upon the latter’s assuming…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Norwood v. HoldenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  2. People ex rel. Jennings v. MarkhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Brungardt v. LeikerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Olsen v. MerrillUtah Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Williamson v. KilloughSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
  3. Territory of New Mexico ex rel. Ma. Sandoval v. AlbrightNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1904
  4. People Ex Rel. Jones v. WoodrumIllinois Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API