Legal Opinion

Brungardt v. Leiker

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1889PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Original Proceeding in Quo Warranto. The facts are stated in the opinion, which was filed at the session of the court in July, 1889.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Simpson, C.:

This is an original action in this court. It was submitted on an agreed statement of facts, as follows:

“The following are agreed by the parties plaintiff and defendant to be the facts upon which the above-entitled action is to be determined, to.wit: That the county of Ellis is one of the duly organized and existing counties of the state of Kansas; that on the 5th day of July, 1888, the board of county commissioners of said county consisted of the following persons and members, to wit: John Pearson was the duly-elected and qualified member of said board from the first…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hayes v. RogersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Connolly v. HaverlyNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Olsen v. MerrillUtah Supreme Court · 1931
  3. State ex rel. O'Connell v. NelsonWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Williamson v. KilloughSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API