Legal Opinion

Pedersen v. Kuhr

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 18, 1972No. 55087PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRIS, Justice.

This action arose from a motor vehicle collision. At the close of all evidence the trial court directed a verdict in favor of plaintiff on his claim and against defendants on their counterclaim. We reverse.

“In considering the propriety of a motion for directed verdict the court views the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom the motion was made.” Rule 344(f) (2), Rules of Civil Procedure.

Driving his truck at 45 to 50 miles per hour, plaintiff proceeded north on a gravel road toward an intersection with a dirt road. Traffic entering the intersection…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Paulsen v. HakerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1959
  2. Cooley v. KillingsworthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  3. Looney v. ParkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  4. Wilkinson v. Queal Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  5. Allen v. Barrett & CarltonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Kendall/Hunt Publishing Co. v. RoweSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  2. Robinson v. Perpetual Services Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1987
  3. Gerst v. MarshallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  4. Iowa Electric Light & Power Co. v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  5. Pose v. ROOSEVELT HOTEL COMAPNYSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API