Legal Opinion

Lombard v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 13, 1924No. 23,992PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, C.

This action for injuries causing death resulted in a verdict of $7,500 for plaintiff as administratrix of the estate of the deceased. Defendant made a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. This motion was denied. Judgment was entered on the verdict and defendant appeals therefrom. Plaintiff made a motion for a new trial. This motion was also denied and plaintiff appeals from the order denying it.

Defendant having asked for judgment notwithstanding the verdict but not for a new trial, the only question presented by defendant’s appeal is whether there is any competent…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Seamer v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  2. Herr v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Edelbrock v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  2. Edelbrock v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API