Herr v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtHallam, J.
This action was commenced December 10, 1921.
Defendant railway company demurred to the complaint on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, the claim being that the complaint shows that the statute of limitations had run before the commencement of the action. The trial court sustained the demurrer. Plaintiff appeals.
The trial court treated' the case as one under the Federal Employers Liability Act. If the court was right in this particular, the case comes within the decision of this court in Kannellos v. Great Northern Ry. Co. 151 Minn. 157, 186 N.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Johnson v. St. Paul & Duluth RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Lavallee v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Seamer v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Kannellos v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- McLain v. Chicago Great Western RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
3Cited by5 opinions
- Edelbrock v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Fullerton-krueger Lumber Co. v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- Lombard v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Edelbrock v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Patroe v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923