Legal Opinion

(HC) Cardenas v. CDCR

District Court, E.D. California

Decided October 23, 2019No. 2:19-cv-02110Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DANNY CARDENAS, Jr., No. 2:19-cv-2110 KJN P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER 14 CDCR, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas 18 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis. 19 The application attacks a conviction issued by the Alameda County. While both this court 20 and the United States District Court in the district where petitioner was convicted have 21 jurisdiction, see Braden v.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API