Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of Kentucky

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 28, 1973No. 71-6516PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

410 U.S. 484 (1973)

BRADEN

v.

30TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT OF KENTUCKY.

No. 71-6516.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued December 5, 1972.

Decided February 28, 1973.

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT.

David R. Hood argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner.

John M. Famularo, Assistant Attorney General of Kentucky, argued the cause for respondent pro hac vice. With him on the brief was Ed W. Hancock, Attorney General.[*]

2Opinion of the Court · BrennanJustice Brennan

Petitioner is presently serving a sentence in an Alabama prison. He applied to the District Court for the Western District of Kentucky for…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.

3Cases cited64 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Carafas v. LaValleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by13 opinions

  1. (HC) Brooks v. LozanoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  2. (HC) Cardenas v. CDCRDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  3. (HC) Dawson v. ParrDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  4. (HC) Flores v. EatonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  5. (HC) Fregoso v. SpearmanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API